Employee Experience and ESG : the Underestimated Role of Communication Tools

There is a lot of conversation about employee experience. HR teams invest in workspace design, wellbeing programmes, and flexible working policies. Leadership teams publish engagement scores in their ESG reports. And yet one fundamental element of daily professional life consistently falls outside the frame : the quality of communication tools.

A sales rep spending their day fighting an unstable phone system. A customer service agent whose calls drop mid-conversation. A manager whose remote meetings are constantly disrupted by network issues. These are not anecdotes. They are daily frictions that exhaust, demotivate, and silently degrade quality of working life.

An organisation's social performance is not built on HR policies alone. It is also built on infrastructure. And telephony is part of that infrastructure.

‍

What communication tools actually do to engagement

Employee engagement is one of the most closely tracked ESG indicators, and one of the hardest to move durably. Organisations invest heavily in recognition programmes, management rituals, and training. But they often neglect the most basic working conditions.

Research in organisational science is clear on one point : technology frustration is one of the primary drivers of disengagement. When an employee regularly loses time because of failing tools, two things happen. First, a measurable loss of efficiency. Then, more insidiously, a loss of meaning : it is hard to feel valued and effective when the organisation does not give you the means to be.

A 2023 Nexthink study estimates that digital tool problems cost an average of 29 minutes of lost productivity per employee per day. Over a year, that is more than 120 hours per person. Lost time, accumulated frustration, and a signal sent to teams about the value the organisation places on them.

Telephony : the weak link in the digital employee experience

In surveys on the digital employee experience, messaging and collaboration tools most often top the list of dissatisfaction. Telephony is rarely mentioned explicitly, not because it works well, but because it is so ever-present that nobody thinks to question it.

Yet for sales teams, customer service agents, and field managers, the phone remains the central work tool. Its quality, reliability, and ease of use directly condition the quality of interactions and, by extension, the quality of the working experience.

A sales rep whose calls are flagged as spam is not just less effective. They are also demotivated, facing a daily friction on their primary activity. A customer service agent whose line drops or whose audio quality is degraded cannot do their job properly, regardless of their relational skills.

‍

Quality of working life and telecom infrastructure : the link that ESG reports ignore

Quality of working life has become a structural pillar of ESG strategies. Companies measure absenteeism rates, eNPS scores, and engagement survey results. What they rarely measure is the correlation between the quality of communication tools and these indicators.

Yet that link exists. It is documented across several dimensions.

Cognitive load first. Working with fragmented, poorly integrated, or unreliable tools increases the mental burden on employees. Every technical friction is a micro-interruption that consumes attention and generates stress. Over time, this is a factor in professional burnout that wellbeing surveys do not capture directly, but whose effects accumulate.

Relationship quality next. For roles in contact with clients or partners, the quality of the communication tool directly conditions the quality of the relationship. A smooth, clear, well-routed call creates the conditions for a quality human exchange. A disrupted, interrupted, or poorly identified call creates frustration on both sides.

Autonomy finally. Reliable, well-integrated mobile tools accessible from anywhere are a concrete condition of flexible working. The promise of remote or hybrid work is hollow if the telecom infrastructure does not keep pace.

What changes when the tool is genuinely up to the task

The reverse is equally true. When communication tools work well, several positive effects compound. Employees spend less time working around technical problems and more time on their core role. Client interactions are smoother, reducing pressure on customer-facing teams. Managers can lead remotely without being slowed by infrastructure issues.

These effects are not abstract. They show up in the indicators that HR and ESG teams already track : employee satisfaction rates, engagement scores, turnover rates, absenteeism. A telecom operator that contributes to the reliability and fluidity of communication tools contributes, indirectly but genuinely, to these indicators.

‍

Telecom infrastructure as a component of social ESG policy

The social criteria of ESG traditionally cover employment, training, diversity, health, and safety. Digital and telecom infrastructure almost never appears explicitly. It is a blind spot worth addressing.

Several reasons support a more formal integration. Coherence first : an organisation that displays strong commitments on quality of working life and employee experience, but tolerates failing communication tools, creates an inconsistency that teams notice and that reporting does not capture. Measurability next : unlike some social criteria that are difficult to quantify, the impact of communication tools on productivity and wellbeing is measurable with concrete indicators.

A few relevant indicators to integrate into social reporting :

• Communication tool availability and reliability rates
• Average time lost per employee due to technical issues
• Correlation between tool quality and engagement scores by team
• Share of field employees equipped with mobile tools suited to their actual usage

This data exists. It is rarely consolidated. Bringing it together and linking it to standard HR indicators is one of the most concrete ways to give substance to a "working conditions" axis in an ESG report.

‍

What HR and leadership teams can do right now

Reconciling employee experience and telecom infrastructure does not require a major transformation programme. A few simple actions are enough to start the movement.

Include communication tools in engagement surveys. Adding two or three questions on the quality and reliability of telephony tools to existing employee surveys costs little and often surfaces major irritants that were flying under the radar.

Cross-reference IT and HR data. The IT team knows which technical incidents occurred, on which equipment, and how frequently. The HR team knows where engagement is most fragile. Cross-referencing this data often reveals undocumented correlations and makes infrastructure investments easier to justify.

Integrate digital quality of working life into supplier selection criteria. At the next telecom procurement process, include criteria on service quality, network reliability, and user support in the evaluation framework. These are not secondary criteria : they are direct conditions of the employee experience.

Document the link in the ESG report. Explicitly mentioning communication infrastructure as a component of the quality of working life policy sends a strong signal internally about organisational coherence, and externally about the rigour of the social approach.

Choose an operator that understands this challenge. An operator that measures service quality, offers demanding SLAs, and supports clients in usage analysis becomes a partner in employee experience, not just a line supplier.

‍

Conclusion

Employee experience is built through major HR policies, but also in the details of daily working life. A call that connects cleanly, a tool that responds when needed, an infrastructure that does not force teams to work around technical problems : these are working conditions, not commodities.

Organisations that integrate the quality of communication tools into their social ESG strategy are not just ticking an additional box. They are building coherence between their commitments and their practices, a coherence that employees, clients, and investors know how to recognise.

Un1ty supports leadership, HR, and IT teams in this approach, making reliability and service quality contractual commitments, not commercial arguments.

‍